Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Winning System *I think*

$
0
0


Do you think wait for 25 of the 37 to come and then bet the remaining un-hit.
In J247 avg document waiting for the 26th non-hit has taken a max of 12 spins in 204 games, passing the 8th spin only 4 times  :thumbsup:

Max 12 spins. How you overcome this ?

Re: Winning System *I think*

$
0
0
Den this 1st
just played this on multi player, normy was there so he see the #'s.
Look 9,+4 then 15th 0x is in by spin 27 ridiculous ,so kept at the repeats. Got 29 in 60 usual result.

Went for the remaining 12#'s after 41st spin, came  in 3 spins.

Can cover 9 spins with 1,1,2,3,4,10,20,30,40 but thats for units of .20p in bookies, so b+m must be able to go 12

Re: Where art The Mighty Wally Gator?

Re: Winning System *I think*

$
0
0
Denzie have you looked at average document, just look at 25th gone looks ok

Re: Where art The Mighty Wally Gator?

$
0
0
WG and Celtic been seen cleaning out the casino's safe

Re: My intro to how I play (dice setting)

$
0
0
Re: My intro to how I play (dice setting)

Interesting but surely the casino wouldnt let you constantly throw the same way. And they rotate the shooters al the time so you would have like one shot to get it right then someone else takes over. At least thats how I assume it works. Im more of a h...
Source: Re: My intro to how I play (dice setting)

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17410.0

Anyone making money with sports bets?

$
0
0
Anyone making money with sports bets?

Sports betting is something I can understand although Some od the odds talk does get confusing. I would lime to hear from people have been doing this for a while. Are you winning? I mean making money in any significant quantity?
Source: Anyone making money with sports bets?

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17411.0

Re: Coding services

$
0
0
Re: Coding services

How much do you normally charge to code an average system, and what games can you code for? I dont mean bots, I mean scripts to test systems.
Source: Re: Coding services

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17412.0

Re: Marcel1: A Cold Two-Dozen Trigger System

$
0
0
Re: Marcel1: A Cold Two-Dozen Trigger System

@all: I like to alternate (if you haven't noticed in the testing) wheels.  If you have only one
live wheel wait for all dozens or columns show between sessions before starting a new one.

Example: 20,0,23,1,2,0,35 (all three...
Source: Re: Marcel1: A Cold Two-Dozen Trigger System

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17413.0

Re: Where it all started

Re: Ken's Movie Ratings, 1-10

$
0
0
Central Intelligence >> 3.5

Mother's Day >> 2.5

The Shallows >> 3

Free State of Jones >> 7.5

The Purge: Election Year >> 2

Our Kind of Traitor >> 6

Mike & Dave Need Wedding Dates >> 5.5

The Legend of Tarzan >> 4.5

The Infiltrator >> 7.5

Star Trek: Beyond >> 3.5

Lights Out >> 2.5

Jason Bourne >> 6

Bad Moms >> 6

Re: Boner

Re: Boner

$
0
0
im still doing some tests -but not many (busy at work)

Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie

$
0
0
This is a slow trott that I had difficulty in playing. I'm interesting to see what your opinion is about it?
40 spins RNG Bwin 20160723
17
18
14
21
36
28
21
27
30
35
27
33
21
18
9
25
10
6
14
14
9
30
26
27
4
31
18
10
14
7
18
13
1
22
35
9
23
29
14
20
Thanks
-Tuddilue

Must have missed this, with Priyankas tracker, bail out with the 1 unit
Code: [Select]
Spin No.	Spin	Repeat?	Non-hit count	Progression	Result	Bank
1 17 37
2 18 36
3 14 35
4 21 34
5 36 33
6 28 32
7 21 R 31
8 27 31
9 30 30
10 35 29
11 27 R 28 1 -28 -28
12 33 28 2 16 -12
13 21 R 27 1 -27 -39
14 18 R 27 2 -54 -93
15 9 27 3 27 -66
16 25 26 2 20 -46
17 10 25 1 11 -35
18 6 24 1 12 -23
19 14 R 23 1 -23 -46
20 14 R 23 2 -46 -92
21 9 R 23 3 -69 -161
22 30 R 23 4 -92 -253
23 26 23 5 65 -188
24 27 R 22 4 -88 -276
25 4 22 5 70 -206
26 31 21 4 60 -146
27 18 R 20 3 -60 -206
28 10 R 20 4 -80 -286
29 14 R 20 5 -100 -386
30 7 20 6 96 -290
31 18 R 19 5 -95 -385
32 13 19 6 102 -283
33 1 18 5 90 -193
34 22 17 4 76 -117
35 35 R 16 3 -48 -165
36 9 R 16 4 -64 -229
37 23 16 5 100 -129
38 29 15 4 84 -45
39 14 R 14 3 -42 -87
40 20 14 4 88 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

Re: Yet another system recipe


Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

$
0
0
3Nine, Steve is just trying to protect his fellow citizens and warn us about potential scams as he sees it - particularly those members who frequent this forum, i.e. on his own turf. Shame Steve can't share the log file as that's what would be needed in a court of law to convict Priyanka. I guess it must be due to the data protection act or some such?

Quote
You are your own person, but I just suggest dont believe everything, and maintain healthy skepticism and an inquisitive mind. Not questioning and not fully thinking things through is likely to waste your time.
Well said!  :thumbsup:

Quote
Good luck finding the "proof" - it's all there, Falkor.
I'm still testing - thanks! I realised from the beginning it could all be a waste of time as per potential red flags duly noted by Steve, but I am happy to proceed as I find it a fascinating subject - and it keeps the brain stimulated (not many things can). I must have tried and failed with scores of systems before I began following Priyanka. It's a big sacrifice - but I find it beneficial all the same. Its not the money - it's the paradoxical nature of the game that keeps me interested.

Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

$
0
0
So... Steve's investigation into Priyanka has finished and his findings are damning to say the least. However, my investigation still continues... she deserves a fair trial. Currently, I am following up on one of her official statements:

"If our selection process does not result in a random sequence but instead on a predictable pattern will these stats and distribution hold good."

This one, alone, deserves a separate trial I think!!!  8)

Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

$
0
0
You still refer to him as a she

Lets get passed that hurdle first

Howeber i do understand this is the internet so who the hell knows what happened

Noone could ever know 100 percent

Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

$
0
0
You wouldn't use it. You would sell it. There is a difference.

I have numerous methods to beat roulette. I dont mind "selling" the less effective methods a mere $2500, but its actually "licensing" because not even the players get the algorithms for bet selection. Its in the software. My best method is shown at www.hybridroulettecomputer.com and the options to acquire it including getting it for $0.00 up-front and pay from winnings (See http://www.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/). I make the most profit from giving it away free. In such arrangements, I sit at home and on my tv watch streamed video of players win inside the casino. Literally, that's what I do. Here:

OPTION 4: $0.00 up-front (access fee), plus "any payment you feel is justified" per 24/hr period of use

With this option, you buy your own equipment (phones etc). The exception is a $200 custom cable you get from me, although you can make it yourself if you prefer. The equipment costs approximately US$1,700 for a three-player team. Then to use the Hybrid, you pay "whatever you want".The catch is we give preferential access to the "highest paying teams": Basically the highest bidders get access to the servers, because we have limited servers and operators who oversee users. So if you only pay $100 when other teams pay us $10,000, we'll of course only work with the higher paying team.


You buy nothing from me except a $200 custom cable, but you can make it yourself if you really want and pay nothing. Basically you buy your own phones and earpieces.

There's also proof out there about JAA.  Is that your best method? Comical.

You dont know anything about it. "JAA" is software. "Cross referencing" is the method to find and validate patterns. The "system" is physics.

In layman's terms, my system (you referred to as "jaa") is like a combination of the known and proven effective methods, rolled into one method. "Cross referencing" is a type of statistical analysis where each set of data is compared to others, to check for consistency. In doing this, we can better rely on short term data to uncover long-term patterns. That's comical?

Since this is your world (aka forum) we will leave it at that. You will spin it any way you need to for more sign ups and more sales.  That's all it's about, right?

Nope. I dont need to stretch any truth. The truth is already available for anyone who cares to do proper research. For the roulette computers, anyone can test them free. As for jaa, all you'll find is deceptive trash about me, not the "system" itself. Let's not get into all that again. The truth about all my methods is easy to find.

I'm wondering, are you willing to be wrong about what exists and what doesn't? And who cheats and who doesn't? 

Absolutely. You dont know me that well. I'm comfortable with who I am, and when I'm wrong, I have no problem admitting it. Too bad about the little sting when your pride gets hurt. Its good for you. Because the ability to admit mistakes clears the path to learning. If you hold tight to pride and trying to never be wrong, you harm yourself. Maybe you missed the recent thread with my apology to Kav (and Angelo, ok yes you too).

I'm out.  There's life beyond this game and seeing you build forum after forum to promote your nonsense pains me.

Sorry to cause you pain.

Priyanka hasn't taken a dime from anyone. Can you say the same?

Nope, you got me there. I openly and transparently trade values. It's called "business" and I trade with ethics and honesty. And I'm not attacking Priyanka. All I'm doing is explaining the facts about his results on the game. Why? Like Falkor said, to protect members. Do you remember Charles Edward Hampshire? When I warned inexperienced members about him, they attacked me and accused me of trying to censor the holy grail, because you know, it would be bad for my business...

Maybe Priyanka has something to offer, maybe not. I've explained the facts about what I know, and anyone can make up their own mind. I know from 20 years of experience, and basic knowledge of math and statistics, that critical claims he has made are incorrect. and I've explained about the game cheating too. I dont need to explain it all again.

Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?

$
0
0
Here is the kind of thing I see from my home tv:

<a href="javascript:;" class="new_win" onclick="post_nav(sdl('n.%msy3vioFTturk.tenpul/hb%/pe3p?.Druc0eroNslmFe=%Hnh2qttFv.tv6rp%2ss2Xs%Fdi3bznAMGg%q1.2SPcFGko%gWm27i/F_QtwXSrwQWawki', 94, 119, 4, 24), {su:window.location}, '_blank');">https://www.youtube.com/v/bMqSGg7_XQk?rel=0</a>

You have no idea about what I do. You assume based on preconceived ideas, and what idiots with ulterior motives said about me.
Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live