Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Is it a stupid way to bet


Re: Yet another system recipe

$
0
0
It's a way to keep the thread to its topic. I don't mind you posting anything here as long as it is related to this system discussed here. I don't want or rather don't like when someone ( not necessarily you ) divert every topic I start to those ideas in random thoughts. Thanks for your understanding.
But that's simply not true is it? Your response rate to questions and discussions - regardless of whether strictly on topic or not - is really rather lousy; however, I don't have the stats to show it. What's more: this topic/system is built on ideas from Random Thoughts, so somewhat relevant. All you are doing is creating an artificial divide in your mind. Anyway, you don't have to justify your lack of communication since it's your own topic and your free time, at your expense, but please don't lie to yourself. It's not healthy. As Turner says: he needs to try to keep you honest. :P

Dare I approach Priyanka and ask her a serious question about this system? I will probably get accused of raping a woman instead.  :girl_to:

Re: Yet another system recipe

$
0
0
Just remember, Priyanka: I'm not your enemy and neither is Steve - it's those people you have sworn oath to.  :-X

Re: Hi

$
0
0
Re: Hi

Hi dicesetter,

Practice and practice and practice.  Nothing beats real play though.  At this point in my play, I would say that I'm breaking even.  Better than most I would say.  I agree that courses and hands on teaching haven't done much for me.   I ...
Source: Re: Hi

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17468.0

Re: Andrew1: A Decision Before Last Even Chance System

$
0
0
It's flat bet right? And essentially you
are betting against a chop, right?-Mogul397


Yes it's a flat-bet system and
an exploit of chops and streaks.

So you have many single wins, or "session
wins" where the results are basically even.


There's no 'middle ground' with this system.
You'll either come out ahead +1 unit or

end session with -5 units.

You are just doing it flat.

Yes the possibility of a -5 session is there. 

A D'Alembert wouldn't change the outcome
except make the wins or losses faster imo.

I'm going to need to test this one
extensively just to see how it holds up.

Re: Randomer Thoughts

$
0
0
Previous spin also 66%....... zzzzzzzzzzzzzz  :yawn:

Re: Randomer Thoughts

Re: A complete Street


Re: Randomer Thoughts

$
0
0
I checked the calculations and the previous 2 defining elements - even with advanced tracking - have no effect:
168   19.02604757
542   61.38165345
173   19.59229898
   
883   

Dozen 2 has 61% when the previous defining/dominant dozen is 2.

In the above example the previous defining dozen before 2 was 1 - but 1 is 19% the same as dozen 3.

If you combine dozen 1 and 2 you get 80% - but you don't need to track both defining dozens for this:
710   80.40770102
173   19.59229898
883   

However, the 80% is artificial, i.e. it has no edge by default because you need to know the cycle length.

Conclusion: it doesn't seem like we can gain direct edge over the defining element - but we can with the cycle length - possibly with the order element too. So if we get a bias with the cycle length then I think the above 61%/80% will become enabled and start to function as real bias (no longer artificial).

As for the 74% I think Scarface must be terribly confused or mistaken....

Count 18

$
0
0
Nothing is complete bulletproof when it comes to roulette, no matter how "good" your system is, losses will always come, so the question is, from X number of trials will you win more than you lose?

Procedure: First hit, bet the two unhit numbers of the same color within the doublestreet hit. (2 numbers bet).

* IF the other color hit bets are changed into that new color, same bet as above; -bet the two unhit numbers of the same color within the same doublestreet hit. (and +1u bets)

*IF the same unbet number hit (of the same color), no change (+1u bets)

*AFTER 18 spins and no hit (+1u bets)

ALWAYS restart the count from 1-18 after a new bet is done (or after 18 spins)

When hit, do one spin and restart procedure.
====================================

First test was played with 1u bets, (wingoal +200, stoploss -200)

8/10 Games won

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17485.0

Re: Paying for tips in sport betting

$
0
0
Re: Paying for tips in sport betting

I would never pay for a tip. I would look at the free one's, but anyone who has a good system going for them typically keesp it to themselves. That's been my experience at least.

Source: Re: Paying for tips in sport betting

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17496.0

Re: Anyone making money with sports bets?

$
0
0
Re: Anyone making money with sports bets?

I do okay with football because I know it so well. The dogs I only play once in a while so I tend to break even......if that.
Source: Re: Anyone making money with sports bets?

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17497.0

Tracking Them Down

Re: Does Turner possess the Holy Grail or its history of exploration?

Re: Follow last dozen for repeat


Re: Variance

$
0
0
@General >> Daaaaaaamn, forgot to say, dont PM me, email instead please.

Ken

Re: denver airport. what?!

Re: denver airport. what?!

Re: denver airport. what?!

$
0
0
Something very strange there

Wouldnt rule out a bunker.

Re: Variance

$
0
0
Ghost,

Why are you so obsessed with me?


Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live