The ratio was on the low side... 12.71%... 0.24 becomes 0.1 but this is still a result in the positive....
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
↧
Re: Did Priyanka cheat on Steve's multiplayer game?
I do agree with steve though that random has no limits
But for reasons we cannot explain some things just will not happen even with no limits.
42 1st dozens in a row? Nah
But for reasons we cannot explain some things just will not happen even with no limits.
42 1st dozens in a row? Nah
↧
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Falkor....
Although I have to admire your drive....i really dont have a clue what you are talking about. Seriously.
Its kinda manic to read. (No disrespect intended)
Could you explain it as if you are explaining it to my Mother.
( my mother doest read this forum...so I am safe)
Although I have to admire your drive....i really dont have a clue what you are talking about. Seriously.
Its kinda manic to read. (No disrespect intended)
Could you explain it as if you are explaining it to my Mother.
( my mother doest read this forum...so I am safe)
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Lol Turner....your not the only one. He lost me some time ago
All I see is he got an edge and 2 posts later it's gone. But talking about determination
All I see is he got an edge and 2 posts later it's gone. But talking about determination
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
I am going to update Random Thoughts - A Simplified Overview soon, which will hopefully make things clearer... sorry. For now I will summarize:
*Each cycle is an event comprising 1 to 4 spins.
*You can play cycles in many different ways and over a differing number of spins based on the event you are playing.
*If you play only 1 spin you will break even using my method of calculating/evaluating ratios (each cycle length has a fixed ratio) vs. payout odds.
*New revelation: if you stitch bets over several spins during the course of the event (a cycle) then you will gain edge! (but not for CL2 under default conditions)
My latest brainstorm (never seems to end!):
Could we we play for both CL3 and Same or CL2 and Different (etc.) - albeit with a whole new set of ratios ? ? ? ? ?
*Each cycle is an event comprising 1 to 4 spins.
*You can play cycles in many different ways and over a differing number of spins based on the event you are playing.
*If you play only 1 spin you will break even using my method of calculating/evaluating ratios (each cycle length has a fixed ratio) vs. payout odds.
*New revelation: if you stitch bets over several spins during the course of the event (a cycle) then you will gain edge! (but not for CL2 under default conditions)
My latest brainstorm (never seems to end!):
Could we we play for both CL3 and Same or CL2 and Different (etc.) - albeit with a whole new set of ratios ? ? ? ? ?
↧
↧
Re: Boner
Rewster88 maybe YOU should start testing
↧
Re: Boner
Any large number bet that shows success is worth testing
My DS theory strategy is also 30 numbers and works very well
My DS theory strategy is also 30 numbers and works very well
↧
Re: Boner
One would think +1 -1 is safe for 30 numbers but be careful
↧
Re: Boner
very fun system I will test more and hope it holds out
↧
↧
Re: Boner
Rewster88 maybe YOU should start testing
Yes i do , but i cant wright the system on rx so i autotest
↧
Re: Boner
Just given ago with real money "William Hill Sling Shot" 10p game, 2 out of 2 so far
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
I took the wiesbaden spin data from 1st January to 15th January and applied some of the concepts that has been discussed here in this thread and outside. I have removed zero from the equation. The results are attached. I have carefully removed one of the columns in the excel that aids in removing apples or pears ( ). Those interested can study the excel.
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद!
↧
↧
Re: Boner
Now 3 out of 3 Real Money !!!!!
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
Don't get robbed by scammers like mePlease!!!! More scammers like you.
Thanks for new video and xlsx
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
i just dont get.. some-where it semes that you bet on ap for Y/N, somewhere for s/d. somewhere for a repeat of cycle lenght.Is "repeat of a cycle length" the same as playing for s/d on cycle lengths, whereas normal s/d that you are referring to is with regards to the defining element, right? And "Yes/No" is during the middle of a cycle when it's in limbo on whether it will close, or remain open, on the next individual spin?
but i cant find other concepts or relations.
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
I took the wiesbaden spin data from 1st January to 15th January and applied some of the concepts that has been discussed here in this thread and outside. I have removed zero from the equation. The results are attached. I have carefully removed one of the columns in the excel that aids in removing apples or pears ( ). Those interested can study the excel.Hi Priyanka, can you please tell us what do these "-- -- --" rows mean that occur every so often? Is it some kind of mini-game division within your sets? And is it based on the law of the third?
Would it help us to study your last 2 videos first (the Journey parts 1 and 2?) before we study this spreadsheet?
↧
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
what do these "-- -- --" rows mean that occur every so often?I believe they just denote dealer change from the Wiesbaden spins download.
Falkor - All your research you are doing on cycles will do nothing but different segmentation of data and all of them will abide by the rules of probability and payouts evening out. Unless you bring in another stream of data count them towards some time given away.
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
113 spinsSome nice ideas there, praline! Would be nice if you could devise something using 4 repeats of the individual quads as opposed to the cycle lengths. That way bets would be placed more frequently.
10 sessions
flat bet result "+2"
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
I believe they just denote dealer change from the Wiesbaden spins download.Priyanka, you suggesting we can only win with parallel games? What can you tell us about the nature of the 2nd stream that we need to bring in regarding your quads videos? For example, are the 2 streams both derived from the flow of quads alone - or must one be accompanied by a completely different stream that is derived from either the dozens or lines?
Falkor - All your research you are doing on cycles will do nothing but different segmentation of data and all of them will abide by the rules of probability and payouts evening out. Unless you bring in another stream of data count them towards some time given away.
↧