Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Last post as a wannabe professional gambler.

$
0
0
Quote
With all the computer power and ingenious minds in the world today, with all the computers beating chess and Go masters, if there would have been a way to win at any gambling games, it would have been found a long time ago

No its actually really simple. The physics and math is really basic and roulette is beaten every day. There are simple and common conditions that make spins predictable enough. Roulette is far simpler to beat than you think. It mostly takes patience and discipline. Its only impossible if you try the impossible.

Re: Last post as a wannabe professional gambler.

Re: Last post as a wannabe professional gambler.

Re: Last post as a wannabe professional gambler.

$
0
0
No its actually really simple. The physics and math is really basic and roulette is beaten every day. There are simple and common conditions that make spins predictable enough. Roulette is far simpler to beat than you think. It mostly takes patience and discipline.

Betting after ball release I can agree. Yep.
But before is a different story...I read about your JAA so many times yet I still afraid of it. It sounds to good to be true. Even if you put in all kind of speeds and rotations etc
..doesn't the wheel act different almost every spin?

Re: Last post as a wannabe professional gambler.

$
0
0
Actually its far worse to have a 9-5 job
Well...I get paid very well and on time every month. They never approach me and tell me I cant work here or arnt getting paid at their discression when I do my job well
If I won the same amount as my current wage every year by living in seedy casinos with losers who stink I would be called a pro gambler.
Sounds aweful.

Re: KTF

$
0
0
29.5.16 KTF +51
Code: [Select]
Spin No.	Spin	Repeat?	Non-hit count	Progression	Result	Bank
1 7 37
2 6 36
3 4 35
4 35 34
5 3 33
6 4 R 32
7 34 32
8 35 R 31
9 36 31
10 29 30
11 20 29 1 7 7
12 29 R 28 1 -28 -21
13 14 28 2 16 -5
14 28 27 1 9 4
15 28 R 26 1 -26 -22
16 23 26 2 20 -2
17 5 25 1 11 9
18 30 24 1 12 21
19 29 R 23 1 -23 -2
20 11 23 2 26 24
21 14 R 22 1 -22 2
22 26 22 2 28 30
23 4 R 21 1 -21 9
24 24 21 2 30 39
25 11 R 20 1 -20 19
26 21 20 2 32 51
27 13 19 1 17 68
28 1 18 1 18 86
29 2 17 1 19 105
30 34 R 16 1 -16 89
31 2 R 16 2 -32 57
32 35 R 16 3 -48 9
33 17 16 4 80 89
34 9 15 3 63 152
35 5 R 14 2 -28 124
36 5 R 14 3 -42 82
37 24 R 14 4 -56 26
38 30 R 14 5 -70 -44
39 14 R 14 6 -84 -128
40 13 R 14 7 -98 -226
41 13 R 14 8 -112 -338
42 20 R 14 9 -126 -464
43 10 14 10 220 -244
44 10 R 13 9 -117 -361
45 21 R 13 10 -130 -491
46 29 R 13 11 -143 -634
47 12 13 12 276 -358
48 16 12 11 264 -94
49 27 11 10 250 156
50 16 R 10 9 -90 66
51 23 R 10 10 -100 -34
52 15 10 11 286 252
53 16 R 9 10 -90 162
54 36 R 9 11 -99 63
55 31 9 12 324 387
56 24 R 8 11 -88 299
57 29 R 8 12 -96 203
58 18 8 13 364 567
59 19 7 12 348 915
60 5 R 6 11 -66 849

Re: Help to close my browser with excel function

$
0
0
Once a girl went out shopping to buy shoes. After getting in and out every shop in the high street she went to a shop which had the shoe just as she liked. But, hmmm.  The size was small and it didn't fit her cute small feet.  Shopkeeper took pity and started checking every avenue he had to find the right size. They called the manufacturer and found the shoe comes in only that size.

Suddenly an idea stuck the girl and shopkeeper fell down when she told him "please cut the top of my toes so that I can fit into these shoes"

Thank you mate for your advice and I understand your point but...Wouldn't be wise to search for another manufacturer who makes longer shoes? Or better a tool that makes shoes longer for all of those who need it? This is gambling and sometimes when you are winning and suddenly losing is difficult for some people to accept their defeat... But the stage of winning exists and it also wouldn't be wise not to protect it. So a try to make a safety program would be a wiser decision I think!

Re: Help to close my browser with excel function

$
0
0
Just use an image recognition macro that clicks anything when it sees the bankroll you set

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0
Thanks Celtic!

1. You stopped at spin 18, because only 6 (payable repeats) remains in next 19 spins...

I do not understand your reasoning. When would you know to start rebetting?
Remember when you make a decision know why you are making it and what you are planning down the road.
I stopped betting after spin 18 because the Single Repeat Averages were met, I am up +57 already and I want the tracking numbers to be a little better than they are. If all hell breaks loose then I will just bail out with my +57 and start again.


2. You continued at spin 23, because we now still except 6 PR (Payable Repeat) in next 15 spins...

Actually there are only five payable single repeats left according to the Averages, because one of the six just hit and we were not betting.
I started rebetting because most of the payable Single Repeats, USUALLY, happen in spins 21-30, there are only 8  spins left in that block and I still have 5 payable Single Repeats I am counting on due.
I say Usually because we are gambling and things can change. We just have to re-evaluate and adjust accordingly if they do.


Or am I right?

-Nextyear

See my comments above in Red.

Here is the payout sheet for Nottos Jackpot247 29May16 numbers.

-Celtic

Code: [Select]
JACKPOT247   29MAY16								
Bet Repeats using G.U.T., Averages, Count
S # R Bet P Stake Won Net Total
1 7
2 6
3 4
4 35
5 3
6 4 R1
7 34
8 35 R1
9 36
10 29 8/10
11 20
12 29 R1
13 14
14 28
15 28 R1
16 23
17 5
18 30
19 29 R2 10 1 10 -10 -10
20 11 10 2 20 -20 -30
21 14 R1 11 3 33 108 75 45
22 26 10 2 20 -20 25
23 4 R2 11 3 33 -33 -8
24 24 11 4 44 -44 -52
25 11 R1 12 5 60 180 120 68      --- Considered quitting at this point with 2/3 of my
26 21 11 1 11 -11 57           payable Single Repeats already here...KTF
27 13 11 2 22 -22 35
28 1 11 3 33 -33 2
29 2 11 4 44 -44 -42
30 34 R1 11 5 55 180 125 83       --- Win/Stop reached so QUIT!!!
31 2 RX 10 1 10 -10 73
32 35 R2 9 2 18 -18 55
33 17 9 3 27 -27 28
34 9 9 4 36 -36 -8
35 5 R1 9 5 45 180 135 127
36 5 R2 8 1 8 -8 119
37 24 R1 8 2 16 72 56 175
NOTE:  R>R1 Designates numbers already repeated
Rx Designates numbers Repeated but not bet on

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0
Thanks for explanation, Celtic!

Today I would expect you to start after spin 20, as you have 4 repeats at 18 spins?!

Re: Reddwarf

Re: Reddwarf

$
0
0
Yes. Wow!

 Just out of curiosity. At what distance we are looking at?
Not sure what you mean mate.....the magnification is x60
Mercury is about  30millon miles from the sun...sun is 99 million from us

If the earth was a euro coin...suns about a 2 metre circle
Mercury is a pea...similar to the moon (bit bigger)
Mercury looks bigger here cos its closer to earth

Re: Reddwarf

Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
Hi all,

I just wanted to share a fun view of roulette. It might be difficult to grasp at first, but really it is fun!

Disclaimer: it is a view, not a strategy. It might trigger some interesting thoughts however

Most people think of roulette numbers as unrelated. Which of course they are: they are the embodiment of the definition of random. Unrelated, unpredictable.

Now lets see if we can come up with some kind of relation (which is indeed based on the pigeonhole principle...)


a. lets create a new sequence of numbers, based on numbers spun
b. in order to to this, we interpret a number spun as the position within a certain sequence of numbers. This position has a number attached to it
c. after a number is spun, we manipulate the sequence as follows:we remove the number that we pointed at
d. AND we glue it to the beginning
e. we keep on doing this

example
lets start we sequence 1,2,3,...,34,35,36
a. lets assume we get number 35.
b. 35 is the 35th position in our sequence. The value is 35 (1,2,3,...,34,35,36)
c. now we create a new sequence: remove 35 from the old sequence (1,2,3,...,34,35,36)
d. and glue it to the beginning: 35,1,2,3,...,34,36

e. etc

Now the fun part starts!
We can use this "dynamic sequence" to create a totally new set of straights, splits etc... I will illustrate this with halves:

in our example we got number 35. We interpreted it as the position in the number sequence. To create highs/lows however, we look at the position of that number within the previous sequence. In this case it is position 35. As this falls in the second half, we assign it "high"

now lets assume that the next number is 35 again! The old sequence was 35,1,2,3,...,34,36. So now we assign it the "low" (first position)

If we do this for all possible number groups we get a "number systems" that is random and similar to what we are used to. I you would only use this number set, you would not see any difference with roulette numbers spun.

So what is the fun part?
Every set of random numbers can be used to create another set of random numbers BUT the sets themselves are related!

How? For example: when we have a repeat in the first set on the straights, in the second set, this will occur in 99.7% of the cases on "low". Or, even stricter: a repeat on straights in one system will will occur in the second system for 99.99994% on the first two dozens.

try it yourself, play with it!

Fun isn't it?

rrbb

Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17115.0

Re: Why did you choose roulette?

$
0
0
35 to 1 payout and easy to win.   :)

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

$
0
0
Looks like it has fallen by the wayside.  I do not know why as it is a very good system.  Stop looking for the HG and use the best of what is available.  This system has 116 pages of comments (mostly positive)How many comments do you need?   I hope by posting this it will resuscitate the patient.  I play alternating double dozens/columns to mix things up a bit and less waiting.  It will not avoid inevitable loss but as Tesco says `Every little helps`   (for those who do not know who Tesco is:  it is a large supermarket chain in many countries.    I am using 1 - 3 - 9 and taking loss (Have had very few) but I quite like the idea of ramping up stakes after a loss for a fast recovery.  The statistics seem to be well in our favour against repeating 1 2 3`s.  For all those that qualify: take my advice and VOTE LEAVE in the UK EU referendum on JUNE 23rd.

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

$
0
0
Looks like it has fallen by the wayside.  I do not know why as it is a very good system.  Stop looking for the HG and use the best of what is available.  This system has 116 pages of comments (mostly positive)How many comments do you need?   I hope by posting this it will resuscitate the patient.  I play alternating double dozens/columns to mix things up a bit and less waiting.  It will not avoid inevitable loss but as Tesco says `Every little helps`   (for those who do not know who Tesco is:  it is a large supermarket chain in many countries.    I am using 1 - 3 - 9 and taking loss (Have had very few) but I quite like the idea of ramping up stakes after a loss for a fast recovery.  The statistics seem to be well in our favour against repeating 1 2 3`s.  For all those that qualify: take my advice and VOTE LEAVE in the UK EU referendum on JUNE 23rd.

It is good if played properly

Hit and run. Not static

I tested this extensively

Its not that it is not good, its that 1 loss takes awhile to recover

Ideas bleep?

Yes 123 is not likely to be followed by 123 it is "rare"

Can wait for 123123 then go in but that trigger takes awhile......

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

$
0
0
<enter D1 in Gut tracker> this one cracked me,just made my day .....lol

Re: Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

Viewing all 12637 articles
Browse latest View live