I'm not sure what to answer that :S, i leave that to the "roulette experts" im just trying to understand the game, and this is what i figure: -imbalance is the dominant trend- And yes, it should work in our favor (?) and no, it won't take to long to show. If this is true, that imbalance is dominant, then a positive progression could be used. But that is yet to be proven...
(More testing is needed)....
My concern is that if this theory worked, someone would have used it to beat the game long ago.
Steve recently posted some ideas on the PA thread that might shed some light on how to build a solid system.
I only say this because you put in so much great work into these tests, that your time is valuable and should be spent only on the logically superior systems.
A good example would be the 30% wins in 200 spins on EC. As far as I know, this has never been breached, so those numbers will not change. So we know that we will win at least 60 bets in 200 spins. Using a known number, as opposed to something being "due", appears to be a much safer bet.
