Yes I know that definition but does it contradict to what occur in the long run?
In 10 spins, gambler fallacy is true
in 100 spins ,may be
but in 1000 spins, not so
The wheel is not due in the short-run but is due in the long-run.
And on top of that, h ttp://www.loothog.com/Systems/GapTest.php
for any given 400 spins (assume it is the spins for a pro-player full time play in a day)
the gap will not be more that 17 average. And even with 100000 spins, will not over 40.
According to the gambler fallacy. It is still possible for a 80 consecutive no-hit to occur but not so in real life.
In 10 spins, gambler fallacy is true
in 100 spins ,may be
but in 1000 spins, not so
The wheel is not due in the short-run but is due in the long-run.
And on top of that, h ttp://www.loothog.com/Systems/GapTest.php
for any given 400 spins (assume it is the spins for a pro-player full time play in a day)
the gap will not be more that 17 average. And even with 100000 spins, will not over 40.
According to the gambler fallacy. It is still possible for a 80 consecutive no-hit to occur but not so in real life.