I'll explain why it could work.
If a dealer spun consistently (on the right wheel) and those consistent spins meant areas of the wheel repeated, and the repeats werent mere coincidence, then you may have an edge by betting on the same sector. It would be further helped if there was a bias in that sector (although a bit hard to know with so few spins).
But why limit it to hitting the same sector? Why not look at +9 pockets, -4 pockets and so on? Then you are getting into dealer signature.
And extend the bias analysis by looking at a larger sample of spins.
There's so much more than could be done. Even the most evil person around (Caleb) pointed out its a step in the right direction.
If a dealer spun consistently (on the right wheel) and those consistent spins meant areas of the wheel repeated, and the repeats werent mere coincidence, then you may have an edge by betting on the same sector. It would be further helped if there was a bias in that sector (although a bit hard to know with so few spins).
But why limit it to hitting the same sector? Why not look at +9 pockets, -4 pockets and so on? Then you are getting into dealer signature.
And extend the bias analysis by looking at a larger sample of spins.
There's so much more than could be done. Even the most evil person around (Caleb) pointed out its a step in the right direction.
Can you explain why she is waiting for virtual wins or losses - what is the trigger for that and how does it seem to work exactly...? Lastly, how is this system betting on non-random? It just looks like she's betting on specific quads based on the result of the previous cycle with an extra "parlay" bet as you put it.
