Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12641 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: "System junkies" large number bets

$
0
0
That's why "readselection" is important.  ;D

I often just read the first post then the last page, and decide whether it's worth reading the full thread.

Re: "System junkies" large number bets

Re: Hot9

$
0
0
Hot, hot, hot - from Ignatus cookbook!

Thanks Ig, you are getting closer...

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
Interesting question ati. Maybe we do the same as with the even chances , unless there is a clear choice to complete the series then we accept it as a loss as priyanka does as I can't see how you could bet all 3 dozens if there where 2 qualifying 2 dozens.

What number are you using to finalize the vdw series for 2 dozens ( 24 numbers ) ? I am guessing 6 so that would give us 123 234 345 456 135 246 ?

Re: KTF

$
0
0
Alot of clouds floated by yesterday. Anyway most annoyed that the recorder mucked up on the 1.4.16 as todays #'s would have been game 100 for the average document.
The part that matters thou is todays #'s
Jackpot247.com 3.4.16 KTF +49 #25.
Code: [Select]
	jackpotjoy 3.4.16
1 29
2 6
3 30
4 15
5 21
6 2
7 11
8 30
9 0
10 1
11 8
12 20
13 1
14 35
15 27
16 29
17 33
18 3
19 25
20 22
21 4
22 35
23 1
24 20
25 24
26 19
27 2
28 14
29 6
30 28
31 11
32 12
33 15
34 28
35 9
36 23
37 14
38 29
39 8
40 6
41 19
42 2
43 35
44 30
45 5
46 16
47 15
48 1
49 0
50 24
51 8
52 32
53 5
54 10
55 19
56 12
57 7
58 22
59 7
60 11

61 29
62 20
63 7

Re: No zero Roulette

$
0
0
Hi everyone. I know some casinos (online i think only so far) offer no-zero Roulette game.
Does anyone knows which casinos offer them? (since many posts i check in sites are outdated on the information they provide.)

If some sites-casinos started ofering no-zero roueltte game shouldn't more follow it as part of the market competititon? Or will the sites offering no-zero roulette also stop offering it as they would see that it is not profitable after all?

Hi Bellagio!
Yeah, so far that's also the only casino I've seen offering a no zero roulette. As far as I understand, that's less profitable for the casino than European or American type?
I've just checked out their website now and they have an upcoming roulette tournament which includes no-zero roulette too.

Re: Even Stevens

$
0
0
Hi willie,

I will also try a test for this - but can you please show an example so that I can correctly understand the exact points when to start/stop betting. Sorry to be a pain but it is important to me at the outset to get it the right way before I start the testing procedure.

E
E
O - bet on E right?
E - W+1 ; so now wait for a virtual L right?
O - virtual win
E - virtual win
E - virtual loss - resume at next trigger right?
O - bet on E right?
O - L-1 ; so now wait for a virtual W right?
O
O
E
O - virtual win - resume betting on E right?
E - w+2 ; wait for virtual L right
O
E
O
E
E - virtual loss ; resume at next trigger right?
E
O - bet on E
E - w+1 ; wait for virtual L right?
E - virtual loss
E
O - bet on E
O - L-1 ;  so now wait for a virtual W right?
E - virtual win; resume betting on O right?
O - w+2

At this point the Profit = +3  - ok?

Regards,
A.

Re: Even Stevens

$
0
0
When you see EO bet on E. OE bet on O

The first 5 spins of your example

E
E
O no bet (EE is not a trigger)
E. Here bet E. (prior was EO) Win.
O. Here bet O. (prior was OE) Win

You could wait a VL after a win just showing the bet example

Re: Even Stevens

$
0
0
Hi RG,

The rule was stated:

"On a win - Wait for a VIRTUAL LOSS and after that when any of the above 2 sequence comes, resume betting..."

So I think I am right?

A.

Re: Even Stevens

$
0
0
Hi RG,

The rule was stated:

"On a win - Wait for a VIRTUAL LOSS and after that when any of the above 2 sequence comes, resume betting..."

So I think I am right?

A.

Yes. U were.

Its early sorry

I tested without the VL thats the only tweak i made

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0
So, here are the numbers that killed my bankroll….

9
26
11
7
35
4
25
20
6
19

10 first spins without any repeats! Everything is looking good!

15
25 R
10
10 R
19 R
21
32
36  Simon have you missed 2 numbers?

10 spins with 3 repeats only! Nice!! Will start after 1st repeat in 21-30

31
31 are these the missing 2#'s
28
3
3 R - Start
24 +1
29 +2
5 +3
4 R +4 WON
22 +1   -- THIS IS WHERE ALL HELL WENT LOOSE….

Since I had only 2 repeats in spins 11-20 I told myself that there were more repeats that had to come but…. I was wrong…

33 +2
28 +3
17 +4
17 +5
33 +6
18 +7
25 +8
27 +9
24 +10 DEAD!!!

No repeats in 31-39 from first 18 one hit only….!!

Well, I guess I will really have to understand the trot…. :-P

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0


Sorry about that....

Here are the good series....

9
26
11
7
35
4
25
20
6
19

10 first spins without any repeats! Everything is looking good!

15
25 R
10
10 R
23
10
19 R
21
32
36

10 spins with 3 repeats only! Nice!! Will start after 1st repeat in 21-30

31
31
28
3
3 R - Start
24 +1
29 +2
5 +3
4 R +4 WON
22 +1   -- THIS IS WHERE ALL HELL WENT LOOSE….

Since I had only 2 repeats in spins 11-20 I told myself that there were more repeats that had to come but…. I was wrong…

33 +2
28 +3
17 +4
17 +5
33 +6
18 +7
25 +8
27 +9
24 +10 DEAD!!!

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0
Thanks Simon
So in the other KTF
spin11 win
spin31 win the reset was right

Re: Multiplayer roulette ready

$
0
0
You're welcome.  I hope it is beneficial

Re: Juggler FINAL

$
0
0
ignatus.......so you are betting a total of 3numbers.......in a 10 spin cycle watch any numbers that hit 2times.....ONCE YOU GET 3 start betting and rebet untill a new number hits 2times  in 10 spins.....are these 10 spins based on a rolling basis????

Re: Juggler FINAL

$
0
0
17/21 Games won

First chart was played with 4 numbers and positive progression, second chart was the same numbers but 3 numbers Flatbet.

Still a loss.

Re: Juggler FINAL

$
0
0

If a number had hit a couple...I was leaving it on a while...so 4 numbers flatbet....+1u if a number hits. Sometimes 5
Dominant Relation between a number(s) that defines the current cycle with the number(s) that define the previous cycle.

Re: Random Thoughts

Re: Juggler FINAL

$
0
0
Dominant Relation between a number(s) that defines the current cycle with the number(s) that define the previous cycle.
I have to say I dont play like this anymore
I tend to use whats happening rather than looking at past spins....but this isnt a bad way to play at all. :thumbsup:
Ive mostly been looking at cycle lengths
It started with my hot cold sandwich but at the time I didnt know I was doing just that.
Sorry to digress Ignatus

Re: Juggler FINAL

$
0
0
18/22 Games won

And that's an ~80% winrate. And that's the final stats for this one.

I think i will go on to something else right now,
Viewing all 12641 articles
Browse latest View live