Yes. red and even (and low 1-18).
I'm not sure the point of the "Brett Morton" piece other than perhaps he
doesn't understand how it works.
Yes, you can choose even-money location combinations where you can cover more numbers
or less numbers - but that changes nothing.
If you cover more numbers per spin, you win more often (smaller amounts) - if you play the locations that cover less numbers - you win less often (bigger amounts).
It doesn't change the math or overall performance to choose red + odd over red + even etc etc....
It appears that way - covering more numbers seems to make sense, but the math doesn't work out as any benefit.
So I picked Low/Even/Red as my combination to bet on - (only because of where I sit, I can reach all 3 without reaching in-front of others playing to get to the other bet locations on the table.)
I'm not sure the point of the "Brett Morton" piece other than perhaps he
doesn't understand how it works.
Yes, you can choose even-money location combinations where you can cover more numbers
or less numbers - but that changes nothing.
If you cover more numbers per spin, you win more often (smaller amounts) - if you play the locations that cover less numbers - you win less often (bigger amounts).
It doesn't change the math or overall performance to choose red + odd over red + even etc etc....
It appears that way - covering more numbers seems to make sense, but the math doesn't work out as any benefit.
So I picked Low/Even/Red as my combination to bet on - (only because of where I sit, I can reach all 3 without reaching in-front of others playing to get to the other bet locations on the table.)