Read this:not sure when that adaptation came in. But it's also troubling to me
0-1-2-3-4-5
1-2-2-4-5-6 < you wont bet on next matrix since we have a zero in the last matrix AND have a win in the current matrix (third spin)
1-2-3-4-5-6
2-3-4-5-6-5 < you bet on next matrix since we have no zero in the last matrix AND have no wins in the current matrix and no zeros in the current matrix aswell.
Then read carefully what I'm doing here:
5 6 1 3 1 2
3 4 5 1 2 5 = 0
4 6 1 3 5 1 = 0 -6
2 6 4 2 0 0 = 1 -2
0 4 3 6 4 4 = 0
1 1 4 3 4 2 = 1 < dont play since 0 came up last matrix
5 3 0 1 5 4 = 0
0 2 3 5 5 6 = 1 < dont play this either
5 2 4 1 4 3 = 2
1 4 4 6 3 3 = 2
2 6 6 1 3 3 = 2
2 1 2 3 3 3 = 3
3 3 1 4 1 1 = 0
3 3 2 4 3 5 = 3 +3
6 6 5 1 6 1 = 0
0 4 4 0 2 6 = 0 -3
1 6 3 0 5 5 = 0 < not this, since you have two 0 last matrix
6 3 6 4 1 6 = 0 < not this either since 0 came up on last matrix
3 1 2 5 2 2 = 0 -9
3 5 1 4 5 2 = 2 +1 (this chart was while I tested doing a mild progression so I bet 2 units on this)
0 = number of wins -6 is the current bankroll.
4 4 2 4 6 1 tracking
5 2 5 6 1 5 L (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and no wins and zeros in the current matrix)
5 0 2 6 1 3 W +5 (win on first spin +5)
4 5 6 6 2 4 W nb
2 6 2 6 4 4 W nb
4 5 2 3 1 2 W nb
1 4 3 3 3 5 W nb (there are no bets all the way since we need a valid loss)
4 6 4 4 5 3 L (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and wins and zeros in the current matrix)
0 3 1 3 6 4 L -1 (had a loss here -1)
5 6 3 1 4 6 L nb (no bet since we have a zero in the previous matrix)
I need more spins but if you don't have anymore, -1 on this.
that I have a cluster of wins, and then the losses.
So I guess I might hat one win in the first row, and then sit out
all the "wins". and then he hit with a loss after waiting for the
row of losses as a signal.
A lot of sitting around.