Judging by your comments in grassroots and here in this thread it seems to me you are looking for a method that never loses....
Boy are you in for dissapointment
They will ALL lose at times
Limit the loss and stop. The future wins will compensate
If you play 5 sessions a week 2 might be losers. Up to you how big the loss
RG, whenever you examine a method that you want to embrace, it is like the "WWW" with so many variables
all over the place.
Am I looking for a method where I can bet $10K each spin, stay even, and after several hours
turn on unit profit? OR am I ready to risk that $10K playing a martingale to win $5/ spin and make
a profit like that?
A lot of swing, and plus neg from the flatbet, and the occasional catastrophic loss that you are always
happy you avoided.
From there the walls close in.
Am I looking for something that never wins? What could the answer POSSIBLY be?
Yes.
You are too. (Now look in the mirror).
The thing that I have going, I suppose is that I always am playing on paper. So when things
go good or bad, and things fall apart, it hurts. But it's all a computer game.
When I walk through here with my hand raised with a conclusive, "this is the one I like and can
win with".
Having said that, with this particular method in question, there has been no safety net for loss.
No discussion of it. In a weird and good way, everyone seems to be playing, winning, and posting
actual play lists, with no talk or concern about "near misses", or even to define what a near miss is.
One final thought about your comment. With all the successful team work and good energy going on here,
it makes me wonder what the point of this post could be.
I don't think we need an philosophical narratives about peoples intentions and such. This, right now, is the
core of a group of deluded people working happily together on something, looks like. And the post that
you just made smells like an attempt to turn it into another 100 pages of shit.
:girl_to:I'll go back to working with the system and talking with the people who post about it. And making commentsabout what I think of their results or how to change them. Not what I think their hopes, dreams, or delutions are.