Almost family time. Wanted to make one more post
For those of you who are testing the different grassroots variations by now you know how powerful it can be. Whether its the original or any of its tweaks
I will say why i think that is
Well, for one we have a 66% chance of winning every spin. Does not change everytime we bet. Past spins have no effect
So why are those testing having such good results?
I have a theory
Roulette is random. Its hard for the wheel to spit out a set pattern time after time after time
123 123 123 has the same chance as happening everytime but will it? No
We are betting against a fixed sequence, which is beneficial when you are at war with random
Will it lose. Yes. Will you win more then lose. Yes.
What i think is happening is we have a 66% chance of winning every spin BUT we are combining that with betting against fixed patterns. Whether it be denzies tweak or any of them.
So the 66% is coupled with the fact the wheel will not spit out the same fixed pattern everytime. Which i think raises from 66% but thats debatable.
Thats why its successful
After the holiday i will test AMK. Even i will not play 1 3 9 27 but i will see what i can do with it
When your chances are more then half and you have the bankroll and you have fixed patterns on YOUR side you wil prevail, i believe
Dont use 139. Use something that you personally are comfortable with
For me thats 1 3 9 then 3 9 27 for recovery. But never just 1 3 9 27. GLC is the man for that department
So to recap why i think people are seeing success: 66% chance COUPLED with the fact the wheel will not spit out fixed patterns
You dont have to agree. This is directed to those playing it.
Rich
P.s. want to add. We arent betting every spin either. Mini games of 3 spins. Win on spin 1 or 2? Wait for that 3 spin sequence to finish before beginning again? Win at spin 2 sit out next spin. You get the idea. Also depends on your trigger and style. Rolling basis is a no no slap on da wrist
1
2 win
3 sit out
1 win
2 sit out
3 sit out
1
2 win
3 sit out
For those of you who are testing the different grassroots variations by now you know how powerful it can be. Whether its the original or any of its tweaks
I will say why i think that is
Well, for one we have a 66% chance of winning every spin. Does not change everytime we bet. Past spins have no effect
So why are those testing having such good results?
I have a theory
Roulette is random. Its hard for the wheel to spit out a set pattern time after time after time
123 123 123 has the same chance as happening everytime but will it? No
We are betting against a fixed sequence, which is beneficial when you are at war with random
Will it lose. Yes. Will you win more then lose. Yes.
What i think is happening is we have a 66% chance of winning every spin BUT we are combining that with betting against fixed patterns. Whether it be denzies tweak or any of them.
So the 66% is coupled with the fact the wheel will not spit out the same fixed pattern everytime. Which i think raises from 66% but thats debatable.
Thats why its successful
After the holiday i will test AMK. Even i will not play 1 3 9 27 but i will see what i can do with it
When your chances are more then half and you have the bankroll and you have fixed patterns on YOUR side you wil prevail, i believe
Dont use 139. Use something that you personally are comfortable with
For me thats 1 3 9 then 3 9 27 for recovery. But never just 1 3 9 27. GLC is the man for that department
So to recap why i think people are seeing success: 66% chance COUPLED with the fact the wheel will not spit out fixed patterns
You dont have to agree. This is directed to those playing it.
Rich
P.s. want to add. We arent betting every spin either. Mini games of 3 spins. Win on spin 1 or 2? Wait for that 3 spin sequence to finish before beginning again? Win at spin 2 sit out next spin. You get the idea. Also depends on your trigger and style. Rolling basis is a no no slap on da wrist
1
2 win
3 sit out
1 win
2 sit out
3 sit out
1
2 win
3 sit out