thanks for testing
im glad to see positive results...
i re-did my test from this morning....this morning i played as mini games, only if a full mini game was unique id bet...i had 4 triggers
playing this new way i have 11 triggers in one hour. significantly more. what i did was whenever there were 3 unique dozens i would then bet against it. first bet won everytime. it didnt matter if they were in the same mini game. at any point there were 3 uniques id bet even if it went into next mini game
112
3 TRIGGER
i was going to use colors. green if won on 1st try. blue if won on 2nd step. purple if won on 3rd step. only greens.
good news
it is obvious that anytime you have 3 uniques betting against the unique repeating is a good bet selection
EDIT: ONE MISTAKE. ONE BET WON ON 2ND ATTEMPT, ALL OTHERS ON FIRST. SO SHOULD BE ONE SHADE OF BLUE
im glad to see positive results...
i re-did my test from this morning....this morning i played as mini games, only if a full mini game was unique id bet...i had 4 triggers
playing this new way i have 11 triggers in one hour. significantly more. what i did was whenever there were 3 unique dozens i would then bet against it. first bet won everytime. it didnt matter if they were in the same mini game. at any point there were 3 uniques id bet even if it went into next mini game
112
3 TRIGGER
i was going to use colors. green if won on 1st try. blue if won on 2nd step. purple if won on 3rd step. only greens.
good news
it is obvious that anytime you have 3 uniques betting against the unique repeating is a good bet selection
EDIT: ONE MISTAKE. ONE BET WON ON 2ND ATTEMPT, ALL OTHERS ON FIRST. SO SHOULD BE ONE SHADE OF BLUE