I am very carefully watching this thread on daily basis and trying to figure out what you are trying to show here.Thanks for the interest shown Drazen. The more interest that you are showing, the more you read these topics again and again, the more iterations you do differently, you will be able to get the answers to the questions you have asked yourselves. There will come a day when you will be able to see past whats happening on the surface and free from the wheel, felt and the statistics that the pit bosses want you to keep your attention to.
Also downloaded all your videos of play in hope it will be useful in better understanding. Your bank demand and DD is impressively low and I think it is not coincidence.
Although my favorites are EC-s here I am showing something about dozens and hoping to get your thought and input.My favourites are double street/lines/6 numbers. But I agree with you, that the more you push your boundaries and come out of your comfort zone, you will be able to take the learnings back to your favourite playing position and play a completely different game.
So if we betting two different dozens in a row not to become 3, we are winning on 12 patterns and losing on 6.Lets not do simulations. Lets not do 1 millions spins. Lets not apply this in practice. Lets break down what you are trying to say.
6 combinations against 12 combinations. Making it simple once against twice. On the outset it looks as if 12 combinations are better than 6 combinations hence this looks like a very good selection. But what is the return on those 12 combinations. You will have to play 2 dozens and hence the return is 1/2 (Apologies for people who don’t understand English odds, it is 1$ returned on a win for every 2$ staked). If you see it that way, you are essentially going back to 6 against 6 (1/2 multiplied by 12). Now you are left to the mercy of deviations, variations and statistic reality to either fail or win.
This is the reason I was pointing back to find out finite, non-random methods within the bet selection process. You have taken the step in the right direction, but I would really encourage you to look deeper.
- What is that you are finding common in those 12 combinations that you have selected?
- Why have you not taken into consideration that other combinations where the dozens have repeated in the first two positions?
- Is there a way you can stitch these dozens together?
- Are you able to find out a common theme between the first and second spins or first and third spins?
- Is three spins sufficient for you to derive that commonality?
I know, a lot of questions
. But all I am trying to do is setting your thought process in a direction that can help you think beyond what you see in the surface. I like your avatar. Someone someday said, "Even Einstein cannot find a way to beat the roulette, unless you can cheat the dealer". But world doesnt always stay flat. It became a sphere one day. You have given Einstein some young muscles. Probably he would look at it differently with those fresh muscles added. 