This bet selection, espoused by Priyanka, is one of the best example, of how we 'dilute' the variance.
Btw, Bleep, also espoused this in the other thread.
This bet selection, if only for betting BLACK/RED,
will always AROUND 50%.
Thus if u only bet that , the variance will hit, now and then..
But,
If u bet THREE together,B/R,H/L,O/E...
then the variance, of each, will "DILUTE" by the other two ...
It is like betting a B/R, on THREE table, at the same time, where a single table's variance, will off set by the other two tables.
for example,
ask three persons, to throw a coin.
note down, the results, in order, of 1st, 2nd, 3rd person,
and viola, u will see the variance, will not long, and the winning will CLUSTERED, with huge win, even with flatbet.
Thus the worst is, ALL three produce VARIANCE, at the same time!..which is HIGHLY unlikely.
Btw, Bleep, also espoused this in the other thread.
This bet selection, if only for betting BLACK/RED,
will always AROUND 50%.
Thus if u only bet that , the variance will hit, now and then..
But,
If u bet THREE together,B/R,H/L,O/E...
then the variance, of each, will "DILUTE" by the other two ...
It is like betting a B/R, on THREE table, at the same time, where a single table's variance, will off set by the other two tables.
for example,
ask three persons, to throw a coin.
note down, the results, in order, of 1st, 2nd, 3rd person,
and viola, u will see the variance, will not long, and the winning will CLUSTERED, with huge win, even with flatbet.
Thus the worst is, ALL three produce VARIANCE, at the same time!..which is HIGHLY unlikely.