Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12637

Re: Nice little earner!!

$
0
0
Hi Nottophammer,

That was a terrible run of numbers that you posted.  Not  even I could do anything with it.  I did count 36 numbers and I usually play in sessions of about 60 so it may have turned around.  Were you on RNG (playing or just recording) or were you on Live.  I only play Live.  What I do do is look back over previous spins (around 16 maybe) to see what is coming out before I start betting.   I want to see chains of 3/4/5. (this could be the key to why I am winning)  In your posting there was only one chain and that was a four, so I would not have been playing on that table.  I know it is stupid to see what has been out previously, but generally whatever trend you see will continue.  It could be a bias towards black, or a bias towards low numbers etc. I play another system on single numbers and I look to see if these numbers are coming out.  It is amazing but not once in 60 spins will any of these 6 numbers appear and it happens time after time, then in another 60 spins they will appear 20 times.
Cheers.

I agree bleep.

If you look back to post 14 and 15 in this thread you will see my explanation of Mr C, which has a similar principle, but he also always encorporated the "movie test".  When you go to a movie you see if you
like it and will stay from the first 10-15 minutes. If you don't like the movie you leave.

Of course the information I have been tossing out has been based on that generator that I posted, but
I've also been looking at zumma here and there.

At Plainridge they have the "wheels" that actually spin the ball mechanically. "Airball"?
And it does it pretty quick.  Maybe I'll shoot down there today for a half hour and see.
I have a bunch of pages of data from there. But none formatted with the EC's. I can
do a trip there in an hour.

What I was looking at in more detail was the idea of playing the last result. But what I was doing
was playing the dominant of the last 3.  So if 2 out of the last 3 was doubles, play for a double,
and if >double for 2 out of 3, play for >2.  Also I was specifically looking and tracking this
on the individual EC.  Red. Black. High   Low. Not the pair. Not sure if this makes any difference,
but it seemed to keep me on track.

What do you think of the airball. It's a real ball.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12637

Trending Articles