Hi Guys,
I have been a secret guest and fan of this forum for some time![:thumbsup:]( "Thumbs-up")
Cool forum by the way, I enjoy the read.
I would like everyones opinion about the way I approach Roulette. Firstly, I always play at a B&M Casino, never online. I play rapid roulette with a live dealer and my average visit (time) is tracking at 65 minutes. In a session, I change tables 3 times and leave as soon as I hit my target ($300). I currently play 2 dozens per bet and have two triggers which I use to qualify a bet. I do use a three step Marty![:P]( "Tongue")
but instead of aiming to win my original wager back when I loose a spin, I add an extra $10 profit per level. Greater risk, bigger reward. When I loose three bets in a row, I call it a day and put the cash I have remaining back into my bankroll. I have currently only lost once in my past eight visits. My aim is too increase my bankroll slowly enabling me increase my bet size whilst reducing my casino visit time.
Using this strategy, I have been quite successful. I do have a system which I play but it is not rigid. If I see trends in the numbers I will sometimes sit out and wait, change tables or increase my bet size. I am not a believer in a Holy Grail system but do honestly believe you can make long term profits with smart play and tight money management.
I currently use two triggers for bet selection, and change tables 3 times per visit to assist with not catching a string of losses. I am a believer that the longer you sit and play the same strategy, the more chance you have of failure. Does anyone else use multiple strategies to qualify a bet? In your opinion, does using a different strategy per bet increase the chances of winning in a real life situation, not against 1 billion spins on a spreadsheet. I was thinking of alternating between 4 different strategies to add more variation to my play, thoughts?
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15576.0
I have been a secret guest and fan of this forum for some time
Cool forum by the way, I enjoy the read.I would like everyones opinion about the way I approach Roulette. Firstly, I always play at a B&M Casino, never online. I play rapid roulette with a live dealer and my average visit (time) is tracking at 65 minutes. In a session, I change tables 3 times and leave as soon as I hit my target ($300). I currently play 2 dozens per bet and have two triggers which I use to qualify a bet. I do use a three step Marty
but instead of aiming to win my original wager back when I loose a spin, I add an extra $10 profit per level. Greater risk, bigger reward. When I loose three bets in a row, I call it a day and put the cash I have remaining back into my bankroll. I have currently only lost once in my past eight visits. My aim is too increase my bankroll slowly enabling me increase my bet size whilst reducing my casino visit time.Using this strategy, I have been quite successful. I do have a system which I play but it is not rigid. If I see trends in the numbers I will sometimes sit out and wait, change tables or increase my bet size. I am not a believer in a Holy Grail system but do honestly believe you can make long term profits with smart play and tight money management.
I currently use two triggers for bet selection, and change tables 3 times per visit to assist with not catching a string of losses. I am a believer that the longer you sit and play the same strategy, the more chance you have of failure. Does anyone else use multiple strategies to qualify a bet? In your opinion, does using a different strategy per bet increase the chances of winning in a real life situation, not against 1 billion spins on a spreadsheet. I was thinking of alternating between 4 different strategies to add more variation to my play, thoughts?
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15576.0