Hi RG,
Something which I’ve been looking at recently, although not in any great detail, is noting the last 3 outcomes of a particular EC, take H/L for example, and the 3 spins are HHL. Let’s say spins 4 & 5 are LL, which is the opposite of HH in spins 1 & 2, I would then bet for spin 6 to be the same as the 3rd spin, in this case betting for L. If spins 4 & 5 were H & H, which is the same as spins 3 & 4, I would bet the opposite of spin 3, which in this case would be H. If spins 4 & 5 were H & L, or L & H, I wouldn’t bet....
HHL
LL – now bet for L (same)
HHL
HH – now bet for H (opposite)
HHL
LH – no bet
HHL
HL – no bet
I’m sure there has been something similar posted on the forum in the past, I’ve been testing it with DSs, where DS 1/3/5 is A, and DS 2/4/6 is B, it seems to give a pretty consistent LW registry, which with the right MM could get you a few units...
Regards
Jim
Something which I’ve been looking at recently, although not in any great detail, is noting the last 3 outcomes of a particular EC, take H/L for example, and the 3 spins are HHL. Let’s say spins 4 & 5 are LL, which is the opposite of HH in spins 1 & 2, I would then bet for spin 6 to be the same as the 3rd spin, in this case betting for L. If spins 4 & 5 were H & H, which is the same as spins 3 & 4, I would bet the opposite of spin 3, which in this case would be H. If spins 4 & 5 were H & L, or L & H, I wouldn’t bet....
HHL
LL – now bet for L (same)
HHL
HH – now bet for H (opposite)
HHL
LH – no bet
HHL
HL – no bet
I’m sure there has been something similar posted on the forum in the past, I’ve been testing it with DSs, where DS 1/3/5 is A, and DS 2/4/6 is B, it seems to give a pretty consistent LW registry, which with the right MM could get you a few units...
Regards
Jim